Types of Korean Hyaluronic Acid: Density and Lidocaine — How to Choose the Right Filler?
- koreanbeautymanage
- Jun 25
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 5

Understanding Density and Lidocaine in Korean Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: How to Choose the Right Filler?
Introduction
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is the most versatile and in-demand dermal filler in aesthetic medicine. But not all syringes are created equal: density (cross-linking) determines the filler’s lifting or hydrating power, while lidocaine enhances patient comfort by reducing pain during injection.
In this article, you’ll learn how to choose the best Korean hyaluronic acid fillers for each treatment by understanding:
The role of density — Light/Fine, Deep, and Volume/Sub-Q.
Pros and cons of fillers with or without lidocaine.
Recommended injection areas and top Korean brands like Revolax, Neuramis, and Regenovue.
Contraindications and best practices for safe use.
FAQs from both professionals and patients.
Key Concepts
Light / Fine Density: Soft gel, low viscosity → ideal for superficial wrinkles.
Deep / Dermal Density: More cohesive gel → suitable for nasolabial folds, lips, moderate wrinkles.
Volume / Sub-Q Density: High-viscosity gel → provides strong structural support for cheeks, chin, jawline.
Lidocaine (0.3%): Built-in local anesthetic; reduces discomfort and erythema.
Cross-linking: Degree of HA bonds that defines gel firmness and longevity.
Pros and Cons of Different Korean Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Types
Type | Advantages | Drawbacks |
Light / Fine (± Lidocaine) | Hydrates the skin, ultra-natural results, minimal swelling | Shorter duration (6–8 months), no volumizing effect |
Deep / Derm (w/ Lidocaine) | Versatile; treats folds and enhances lips with comfort | Requires precise technique to avoid overfilling |
Volume / Sub-Q (w/ Lidocaine) | Provides strong lift and definition; great for non-surgical facial sculpting | May be visible under thin skin; higher cost |
Lidocaine | ✅ Less pain, better patient experience, fewer bruises | ⚠️ Slightly higher cost; not suitable for allergic patients |
Treatment Areas and Recommended Fillers
Facial Area / Concern | Ideal Density | Revolax | Neuramis | Regenovue |
Crow’s feet, smoker lines | Light | |||
Nasolabial folds, lips | Deep | |||
Cheeks, chin, jawline | Volume / Sub-Q |
🔎 All these products are available with express delivery in our Korean Hyaluronic Acid section.
Main Contraindications
Known allergy to hyaluronic acid or lidocaine.
Active skin infection in the treatment area.
Uncontrolled autoimmune disorders.
Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Prior permanent fillers in the same area.
Conclusion
Choosing the right HA filler density and lidocaine presence can be the difference between natural-looking results and an uncomfortable or ineffective treatment.
For hydration and fine lines → Light/Fine.
For moderate folds and lips → Deep/Dermal.
For structure and volume → Volume/Sub-Q.
Lidocaine improves the overall experience, as long as the patient has no allergies. If you’re looking for authentic, certified Korean dermal fillers, explore our Revolax, Neuramis, and Regenovue collections — with free EU shipping from €120 and 100% money-back guarantee if held at customs.
FAQ
How long does a Light filler last compared to Volume? Light fillers last about 6–8 months; Volume fillers may last 12+ months due to stronger cross-linking.
Can I combine different filler densities? Yes — professionals often layer fillers in different skin depths (called “layering technique”).
Does lidocaine affect results? No — it only improves comfort, without altering HA effectiveness.
What if I’m allergic to lidocaine? There are filler options without lidocaine, but you might need topical numbing cream.
When will I see the final results? Immediately after treatment, with full settling within 7–10 days.
References
National Library of Medicine – Cross-linked hyaluronic acid in aesthetic dermatology.PubMed
Revolax Official – Technical Datasheets. www.revolax.com
Derma Medical – Filler Depth Chart & Injection Guide. dermamedical.net
Korean Journal of Aesthetic Medicine – Efficacy of HA Fillers.
Comments